Thursday, March 31, 2011

EFFECT OF EARTH QUAKE IN JAPAN'S ECONOMY

Earthquake and subsequent devastating tsunami has left deep scars on Japan.  The economics of natural disaster is very difficult to write as there are thousands of people who have lost their lives. Writing about economics becomes insensitive but unemotional and rational economic facts suggest that this disaster will have significant effect on Japanese economy.  With impending nuclear disaster looming large, the extent of economic damage is uncertain.

Japan Earthquake's effect on its economy

Japanese economy reeling under the US recession, as of fourth quarter last year was still shrinking. It was expected that Japanese will start growing again by first quarter this year.  With this catastrophe, this recovery will be delayed. The earthquake and tsunami has affected an area which constitutes around 8% of Japanese economy. But there will be ripple effects of this in other parts of the country as well. For example, the loss of electricity generation at several nuclear reactors will dampen activity in oth¬er parts of the country for some time. Nuclear power forms around 25% of the total electricity generation in Japan. Pro¬duction supply-chains and/or transportation of goods and services could also be disrupt¬ed.

In case of manufacturing, for example Toyota, one plant shutting down can have ripple effect across other plants which use those parts. Just in time inventory which originated from Japan could cause problems in future because of low inventories and problems in transportation. Japan exports more than it imports. The demand of goods comes from outside the country. The demand from other countries is not going to drop because of earthquake. So this works in favor of Japanese economy.

Japan’s fiscal situation Is worst among the industrialized nations. The government has a gross debt-to-GDP ratio of 210%, a net debt-to-GDP ratio of 120%, and it is currently running a fiscal deficit of about 8% of GDP.  Approximate cost of reconstruc¬tion will be around US$ 200 billion, which is roughly 3.7% of Japanese GDP. Assuming one fifth of those damages will be covered by insurance companies, this would still leave the Japanese government with a fiscal cost of close to 3% of GDP, which is significant, but should not prompt a fiscal crisis. The impact on the fiscal deficit will be incremental, as not all the reconstruction spending will be done at once. As the country recovers from the shock, stronger economic activity will also translate into rising fiscal receipts. 85% of Japanese debt is held by Japanese citizens. Due to the high personal savings rate, it is the Japanese people that determine the borrowing ca¬pacity of the government. It will be very difficult for Japan to borrow from outside due to exacerbated fiscal situation. Either they will have to sell their investments in US treasuries or they will have to print the money. This may trigger inflation. 

The earthquake has had a prominent effect on yen, Japanese currency. The explanation is that Japanese insurance companies are expected to have to sell foreign assets and repatriate funds to pay for the insurance policies. With demand for yen increasing, this will appreciate yen. Hedge funds investment which borrowed yen and invested in higher yielding currencies like AUS$, was a profitable investment as long as rate of appreciation of yen < interest rate in the target currency.  However, the recent crises had hedge funders become wary and start unwinding their technical position. As a result, yen became more expensive, which altered the original yen appreciation < rate of return equation. A positive feedback loop ensues.

Oil prices have dipped as well, but this is after having increased amid the political instability in the Middle East and North Africa. The pullback in oil is a reflection of the fact that Japan is a major oil-importing nation. If economic growth in Japan is weaker-than-anticipated, it supports a lower price for crude.

Lastly, earthquakes tend not to be that devastating in the long run. Confidence is a major driver of economic activity. When consumers and companies get nervous they spend less and that can cause recessions. But earthquakes do not hit consumer confidence because earthquakes are specific events and the scope of the damage is usually known pretty quickly, if not the eventual cost.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Capital Budgeting

• Capital Budgeting is a project selection exercise performed by the
business enterprise.
• Capital budgeting uses the concept of present value to select the
projects.
• Capital budgeting uses tools such as pay back period, net present
value, internal rate of return, profitability index to select projects.



                              Capital Budgeting Tools
• Payback Period
• Accounting Rate of Return
• Net Present Value



          Payback Period :
 
Payback period is the time duration required to recoup the investment committed to a project. Business enterprises following payback period use "stipulated payback period", which acts as a standard for screening the project.


Advantages Of Payback Period
 
• It is easy to understand and apply. The concept of recovery is familiar to every decision-maker.
• Business enterprises facing uncertainty - both of product and
technology - will benefit by the use of payback period method since the stress in this technique is on early recovery of investment. So
enterprises facing technological obsolescence and product
obsolescence - as in electronics/computer industry - prefer payback
period method.
• Liquidity requirement requires earlier cash flows. Hence, enterprises having high liquidity requirement prefer this tool since it involves minimal waiting time for recovery of cash outflows as the emphasis is on early recoupment of investment.


Disadvantages Of Payback Period

 
• The time value of money is ignored. For example, in the case of project
• A Rs.500 received at the end of 2nd and 3rd years are given same
weightage. Broadly a rupee received in the first year and during any
other year within the payback period is given same weight. But it is
common knowledge that a rupee received today has higher value than a rupee to be received in future.
• But this drawback can be set right by using the discounted payback period method. The discounted payback period method looks at recovery of initial investment after considering the time value of inflows.



Accounting Rate Of Return

Accounting rate of return is the rate arrived at by expressing the average annual net profit (after tax) as given in the income statement as a percentage of the total investment or average investment. The accounting rate of return is based on accounting profits. Accounting profits are different from the cash flows from a project and hence, in many instances, accounting rate of return might not be used as a project evaluation decision. Accounting rate of return does find a place in business decision making when the returns expected are accounting profits and not merely the cash flows.

Advantages

• It Is Easy To Calculate.
• The Percentage Return Is More Familiar To The Executives
.
 


 
Disadvantages

• The definition of cash inflows is erroneous; it takes into account profit  after tax only. It, therefore, fails to present the true return.
• Definition of investment is ambiguous and fluctuating. The decision could be biased towards a specific project, could use average investment to double the rate of return and thereby multiply the chances of its acceptances. 

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Debentures - the Debt Instruments

In the financial world, investors are usually on the lookout of regular fixed income on their investments. Here in this article we would try to analyze one such commonly heard fixed income instrument by the name Debenture. Often in the newspapers we can see the terms debentures and bonds used in the same context. So what exactly do these two terms mean. They are basically fixed income instruments used by the borrowers who wish to raise capital for the business purpose




So does that mean both are the same? The answer is actually NO.
Debentures and bonds are debt instrument but have varying profile of risks associated with them. Bondholders have security in the form of underlying assets incase there is any default on the part of the issuer. However in the case of debentures, they are unsecured and have no access to the assets of the issuer. They are backed only by the creditworthiness and reputation of the issuer. Yet another difference happens to be the fluctuation of the bond value depending on the market interest rates whereas the debentures are usually not traded.
To understand the concept better let us see how it actually works. A Company X wants to raise Rs 100 Cr in the form of bonds. If the company is willing to pledge Rs 100 Cr worth of its assets to the bondholder it provides cushion to its borrowers that they would be repaid in case of default. Thus bonds are referred to as asset backed or securitized. However let us assume that the same company is extremely credit worthy, and then pledging its assets may not be necessary to attract investors. In this case they could issue debentures and the debenture holders would have claim to the assets of the company which is not pledged to the bondholders.
So if both the bonds and debentures are almost similar why do people have to invest in debentures which carry a higher risk profile as compared to bonds. The reason lies in the higher interest rate offered on debentures to reflect the higher risk attached to it.
Now like in a share or a bond market, when the debenture by corporate it could be issued at a premium or at a discount. So if the debenture is issued at a price more than their nominal price, then it is said that it is issued at a premium. But if the debenture is issued at a price lower than its nominal price, then it is said that it is issued at a discount.



Friday, March 11, 2011

Retail investors must keep their expectations of returns from the markets reasonable

A retail  investor's equity exposure should be based on asset allocation,risk appetite and most importantly,on what stage of life he/she is in.those who do not understand equities should invest either via mutual funds or opt for portfolio management services,where professionals manage the portfolio and one simply monitors the investments.both new and existing investors should invest  regularly in equities in small tranches rather than in lump sum..the investors should avoid pertaining to their equity participation,they should avoid any kind of leveraging or margin funding.if the markets correct and you cant top up your account,your investment can get sold off at the wrong point,resulting in losses. Investors should understand that any erosion in the value of their portfolios is only a notional loss. So,unless you are forced to exit equities at a loss,there are no losses,even if the markets correct. Let the return expectation be reasonable. DON'T CONSIDER THE EQUITIES AS A CASINO WHERE YOUR MONEY CAN DOUBLE OVERNIGHT.
                   I would invest in Infrastructure  and capital goods sectors have to grow for indias GDP to be robust.Both these sectors have not done well in the past 12 -18 months.This is a contra bet but according to me investors should include these sectors with a long term view